As used in this report, the term "contract" refers to legal agreements between a provider and funder. This excludes staff-based programs with annual budgets but includes nonprofit corporations under contract with a funder, part-time contractors, and contractors who may be referred to as the jurisdiction's public defender. The term "contractors" refers to the attorney, law firm, associated attorneys or firms, or organization that provides representation to indigent persons under contract. A review of the history of indigent defense contracting in the United States focuses on judicial responses to contract systems, legislatures and contract systems, the New York City experience, and empirical studies of contracting systems. This is followed by an overview of the characteristics of deficient and effective contract systems. The report concludes with a review of the lessons learned from past experiences in indigent defense contracting. One lesson is that certain types of contract models carry more risk than others. A second lesson is that requests for proposals should establish guidelines, qualifications, and standards. A third lesson is that national, enforceable standards are needed. The fourth lesson is that monitoring and evaluation are important. Appended national standards and five references for more information
Similar Publications
- Two-year Review of Firearm-related DNA Casework Evidence: A Triage Process to Improve Quality and Efficiency
- Research on Intimate Partner Sexual Assault Using Previously Unsubmitted Sexual Assault Kits
- Implementation of Electronic Health Record Integration and Clinical Decision Support to Improve Emergency Department Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use