Principles of Problem-Solving Justice (NCJ 234803), BJA. Principles described in this article emphasize collaboration, engagement with local stakeholders, and individualization of sanctions—strategies that avoid cookie-cutter approaches and encourage justice practitioners to embrace local priorities, resources, and circumstances.
What is a Community Court? How the Model is Being Adapted Across the United States By Julius Lang
There are dozens of community courts in the U.S. and around the world. This paper explains how they have adapted key principles of problem-solving justice—such as enhanced information, community engagement, collaboration, and accountability—to local conditions.
Defining the Problem: Using Data to Plan a Community Justice Project By Robert V. Wolf
This publication looks at how community justice initiatives across the county have used concrete data to define local problems.
Lessons from Community Court: Strategies on Criminal Justice Reform from a Defense Attorney By Brett Taylor
Since the first community court was created in 1993, a generation of judges, lawyers, and court staff have developed new strategies for working with those charged with low-level crimes. In this report, Brett Taylor shares lessons he learned first-hand from his years working as a defense attorney at the Red Hook Community Justice Center and helping other jurisdictions adapt the community courts model. These lessons are relevant to any court system that seeks to improve outcomes for communities, victims, and offenders alike.
Advancing Community Justice: The Challenge of Brownsville, Brooklyn
This monograph starts with a question: What can we do differently to enhance public safety, reduce the use of incarceration, and improve public perceptions of justice in a Brooklyn neighborhood that experiences both high crime and high rates of incarceration? The paper provides answers by looking at new approaches (including place-based interventions, procedural justice and new strategies for crime prevention) that have the potential to reduce offending, reengineer the relationship between the justice system and the public, and help activate a neighborhood's capacity to help produce safety for itself.
How Community Advisory Boards Can Assist the Work of the Justice System By Danielle Malangone and Carmen Facciolo
Based on a survey of 20 jurisdictions across the United States currently employing community advisory boards, this fact sheet provides guidance on establishing goals, a review of practical considerations, and examples of accomplishments from around the country.
'The Public Wants to be Involved': A Roundtable Conversation about Community and Restorative Justice By Robert V. Wolf
This document presents highlights from a roundtable discussion about engaging the public in justice programming. Questions addressed included: How do you define "community"? What are the goals of community engagement and how do programs engage communities and retain volunteers?
Evidence-Based Strategies for Working with Offenders By Michael Rempel
This fact sheet distills a growing body of research about evidence-based strategies in five areas for reducing recidivism among criminal offenders: assessment, treatment, deterrence, procedural justice, and collaboration.
Demystifying Risk Assessment: Key Principles and Controversies By Sarah Picard-Fritsche, Michael Rempel, Jennifer A. Tallon, Julian Adler, and Natalie Reyes
This paper explains the science underlying risk-based decision-making and explores both the promise and controversies associated with the increasing application of "big data" to the field of criminal justice.
Renewing Justice: When the Library Becomes a Community Court Podcast
Since 2016, the community court in Eugene, Oregon, has met every week in the downtown library. It is part of an effort that is getting a lot of attention on the West Coast to bring problem-solving justice to friendlier settings. On the Center for Court Innovation's New Thinking Podcast, administrator Cheryl Stone of Eugene Municipal Court talks about the city's replication of a model first pioneered in Spokane, Washington.
Tale of Three Cities: Drugs, Courts, and Community Justice, (NCJ 232872), BJA and the Center for Court Innovation. Inspired by drug courts, the three innovative programs profiled—in Brooklyn, the Bronx, and California—are all tackling the problem of drug addiction. Yet these courts have some important differences from drug court. This monograph highlights how new and innovative community courts are building on the drug court model, expanding the reach of problem-solving principles beyond specialized courtrooms and making a significant contribution to the fight against substance abuse.
Widening the Circle: Can Peacemaking Work in Non-Tribal Communities? By Robert V. Wolf
This report can serve as a guide for justice planners seeking to adapt Native American peacemaking to a nontribal setting. After providing an overview of peacemaking, it outlines key issues that jurisdictions will most likely want to consider during planning and implementation.